Quantcast

Spartanburg Reporter

Thursday, November 21, 2024

Electoral Interference: Democrats in Union see 4.4 change in votes after private funding given to voting officialsr

Vote3

Adobe Stock

Adobe Stock

In Union, where voting officials received funding from a Mark Zuckerberg-related organization, Democrat support rose 4.4% from 2016 to 2020.

In 2020, Joe Biden secured 37% of 13,257 votes, compared to the 39% earned by Hillary Clinton in 2016.

Support for Trump increased in Union 20.4% in 2020.

Union was one of 40 South Carolina areas where voting officials received money from the progressive Centre for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL). A $350 million donation from Facebook founder Zuckerberg and his wife provided funding for the grants.

Grants from the organization, ranging from $5,000 to $19 million, were given to voting officials in exchange for specific conditions being followed. This included strategically targeting voters, creating ballots and developing what are known as “cure letters” to correct ballots at risk of being thrown out for discrepancies in signatures.

Democrat support across South Carolina areas that received funding from the CTCL rose 27.7% in 2020 from 2016.

Such support rose 26.5% in South Carolina areas that didn’t receive any funding from the CTCL.

The Republican Party earned 20.4% more votes in South Carolina districts assisted by the CTCL, compared to 15.6% in counties without similar funding.

The influx of private money on such a large scale was criticized throughout the contentious 2020 election.

The CTCL was sued by Louisiana’s Attorney General in October 2021 “to prevent the injection of unregulated private money...and protect the integrity of elections in the State.” The lawsuit wasn’t allowed to proceed by a State judge.

Criticism of the CTCL also stemmed from favoring “predominantly Democratic counties” and even gave them a headstart to apply for funding, according to emails obtained through Right-to-Know requests.

“Mark Zuckerberg is providing nearly as much money to this year’s election administration as the federal government,” Phil Kline with the Amistad Project said in a late October 2020 press release.

The US government, in the run-up to the 2020 election, was criticized for underfunding the electoral process at a critical time.

Voting differences in some South Carolina locations in 2020 election
AreaReceived CTCL Funding?% Change in Republican Support% Change in Democratic Support
AbbevilleYes21.59.6
AikenYes12.126.8
AllendaleYes5.8-0.6
AndersonYes20.228.8
BambergYes9.72.9
BeaufortYes23.935.1
BerkeleyYes28.747.3
CalhounYes13.79.3
CharlestonYes23.736
CherokeeYes1914.6
ChesterYes19.25.5
ChesterfieldYes21.38.4
ClarendonYes13.26.7
ColletonYes14.812.8
DarlingtonYes12.39.6
DillonYes16.810.3
DorchesterYes19.840.6
EdgefieldYes19.610.3
FairfieldYes14.86.3
FlorenceYes10.316.6
GreenvilleYes17.438.3
HamptonYes123
HorryYes33.150.2
JasperYes36.520.6
KershawYes16.722.9
LancasterYes27.837.1
LaurensYes1914.3
LeeYes7.32.5
MarionYes4.93.5
MarlboroYes18.25.6
McCormickYes11.58.4
OconeeYes22.830.2
OrangeburgYes143.7
PickensYes18.431.8
RichlandYes11.122.8
SpartanburgYes22.732.3
SumterYes1213.9
UnionYes15.94.4
WilliamsburgYes13.73.4
YorkYes23.941.9
Barnwell CountyNo12.37.3
Georgetown CountyNo17.818.9
Greenwood CountyNo14.613.4
Lexington CountyNo1639.9
Newberry CountyNo14.211.9
Saluda CountyNo12.45.3

!RECEIVE ALERTS

The next time we write about any of these orgs, we’ll email you a link to the story. You may edit your settings or unsubscribe at any time.
Sign-up

DONATE

Help support the Metric Media Foundation's mission to restore community based news.
Donate

MORE NEWS